RCA Studio II

Pre-1977 discussion, Pong-type sysems, Fairchild Channel F, etc.

Moderators: Rob, Carlos, Darryl B.

Post Reply
User avatar
Rob
Moderator
Posts: 547
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 5:51 am
Location: NC
Arcade super highscores: 0
Arcade highscores: 0

RCA Studio II

Post by Rob »

Does anybody else own one?

I've got one, but none of the cartridges. Just the built in games, which have little replay value but hilarious sound effects.

User avatar
Zap!
Zap! Commander
Posts: 1808
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 2:37 am
Location: Staten Island, New York
Arcade super highscores: 37
Arcade highscores: 37
Contact:

Re: RCA Studio II

Post by Zap! »

Rob wrote:Does anybody else own one?

I've got one, but none of the cartridges. Just the built in games, which have little replay value but hilarious sound effects.
I have it and several games. This thing is more primitive than the Fairchild Channel F (I have that too). The games are all in black and white.
One burning question that will remain with him until his dying days....."Was my victory really worth the price I had to pay?"

Facebook | Instagram | tumblr | Twitter | YouTube

User avatar
TwinChargers
Posts: 262
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:19 am
Location: Minnesota
Arcade super highscores: 0
Arcade highscores: 0

Re: RCA Studio II

Post by TwinChargers »

I wonder how the people at RCA came to choosing "Studio II" for the name. From what I've read, there never was a "Studio 1" available. Wonder if RCA has (or had) two prototypes and this, the second one, was the one chosen to go out to the market.
These pretzels are making me thirsty!

User avatar
Zap!
Zap! Commander
Posts: 1808
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 2:37 am
Location: Staten Island, New York
Arcade super highscores: 37
Arcade highscores: 37
Contact:

Re: RCA Studio II

Post by Zap! »

TwinChargers wrote:I wonder how the people at RCA came to choosing "Studio II" for the name. From what I've read, there never was a "Studio 1" available. Wonder if RCA has (or had) two prototypes and this, the second one, was the one chosen to go out to the market.
If the II was the one picked, I can only imagine how awful the first one must have been. I too always wondered why it was called "II" when there was no first one. Same thing with Pepper II and Leonard Part VI. :)
One burning question that will remain with him until his dying days....."Was my victory really worth the price I had to pay?"

Facebook | Instagram | tumblr | Twitter | YouTube

Post Reply